![]() ![]() Get help with access Institutional accessĪccess to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. A broad historiographic analysis is offered, as well as a background on the relevant colonial contexts in French and British Africa and Ottoman and Mandate Palestine, viewing the ‘transnational’ aspect. Amongst the main questions are: who imported the planning models to the selected colonial urban areas? Why certain models were selected rather than others at a given moment? And how exactly these models were translated and for whom? By putting the ‘periphery’ at the ‘centre’ of the discussion, our aim is not to ‘provincialise Europe’, but to recognise the difference between metropolitan planning culture and its colonial counterpart through the common thread of the garden city. Diffusive, dynamic and contested aspects of this process were thus highlighted, including those involving indigenous agencies. As exemplified, the transmission process has never been a uni-directional, clear and simple radiation of ideas from a European ‘centre’ to a Near Eastern or African ‘periphery’. By assessing the relationship between colonialism and modern planning through the varieties of garden city, it expands on the multilateral channels for the transmission of these particular planning modes. This introductory chapter presents the ways in which modern urban design has been aligned to power. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |